Comments on: Apple is Lame, Rejects AMG Beefcake! Update http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422 AthleticModelGuild.com | Vintage Male Nudes from the Masters of Mid-Century Beefcake, Bob Mizer and the Athletic Model Guild: classic porn movies, erotic antique nude photo gallery, retro sex pornography galleries, classic vintage hardcore movies, stag film sex, antique vintage erotic history, nude photos and photography, retro hardcore pics and old classic antique erotica porno picture historic site Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:19:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Stuart Martin http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422&cpage=1#comment-8937 Stuart Martin Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:46:10 +0000 http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422#comment-8937 Hey Guys, Apple have had allot of bad press in recent months over their 'questionable' rejections to seemingly inappropriate applications / revision updates. I would suggest a counter reply with feasible reasons such as the ones stated and hopefully they will retract the rejection. I personally see nothing wrong with it and in all likelihood, the right counter reply should get their attention enough to accept it into the app store Stuart M x Hey Guys,

Apple have had allot of bad press in recent months over their ‘questionable’ rejections to seemingly inappropriate applications / revision updates. I would suggest a counter reply with feasible reasons such as the ones stated and hopefully they will retract the rejection.

I personally see nothing wrong with it and in all likelihood, the right counter reply should get their attention enough to accept it into the app store

Stuart M x

]]> By: Keith Heskett http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422&cpage=1#comment-8903 Keith Heskett Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:53:12 +0000 http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422#comment-8903 We thought Apple was cool and they're not. Maybe they are homophobic. Who knows, at least we know what is cool and what is not. We thought Apple was cool and they’re not. Maybe they are homophobic. Who knows, at least we know what is cool and what is not.

]]> By: More App Store Antics | The Republic of Dogs http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422&cpage=1#comment-8892 More App Store Antics | The Republic of Dogs Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:08:35 +0000 http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422#comment-8892 [...] Athletic Model Guild was notified yesterday that their iPhone application “AMG Beefcake 1.1” was rejected by Apple’s App Store nannies on the ground of “objectionable content”.  They attached screenshots of the “objectionable content” from the application itself: [...] [...] Athletic Model Guild was notified yesterday that their iPhone application “AMG Beefcake 1.1” was rejected by Apple’s App Store nannies on the ground of “objectionable content”.  They attached screenshots of the “objectionable content” from the application itself: [...]

]]> By: Christopher Trout http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422&cpage=1#comment-8890 Christopher Trout Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:56:50 +0000 http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422#comment-8890 It's clear that there's a theme here – they're wearing layers: jeans and underwear. It’s clear that there’s a theme here – they’re wearing layers: jeans and underwear.

]]> By: Byrdie http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422&cpage=1#comment-8889 Byrdie Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:38:48 +0000 http://blog.athleticmodelguild.com/?p=1422#comment-8889 The only reason I can think of, having not seen the rest of the photos yet, is that it's something about the hole in the jeans and the white underwear peaking through. However, considering that bikinis are little more than socially acceptable, street-legal underwear I'd think that these pictures would be *more* decent than the ones of women. Odd. The only reason I can think of, having not seen the rest of the photos yet, is that it’s something about the hole in the jeans and the white underwear peaking through. However, considering that bikinis are little more than socially acceptable, street-legal underwear I’d think that these pictures would be *more* decent than the ones of women.

Odd.

]]>